Back

Are "Complementary Policies" Substitutes? Evidence from R&D Subsidies in the UK

Jacquelyn Pless

April 2021

Governments often subsidize private R&D using both direct subsidies and tax incentives. In this paper, I develop a framework for studying their interdependence, which also provides a test for detecting capital market imperfections. I implement two quasi-experimental research designs to examine firms in the United Kingdom and show that grants and tax credits are complements for small firms but substitutes for larger firms. Higher tax credit rates substantially enhance the effect of grants on R&D investment for small firms, particularly those facing financial constraints, but they reduce it for larger firms. The productivity of small firms also increases. My findings imply that the innovation policy mix should include both support mechanisms for small firms only.

Keywords: R&D; innovation; policy interactions; difference-in-discontinuities; regression discontinuity design

JEL codes: D22, H0, H25, L53, O31, O32, O38

For Associates Only

As a benefit to our Associates, the latest Working Papers are embargoed for a period of up to six months before becoming accessible to the public. If you are interested in becoming an Associate or learning more about the benefits of sponsorship, please click here, or email us at ceepr@mit.edu

If you are a CEEPR Associate or CEEPR staff member, please visit the login page here: http://ceepr.mit.edu/associates