Irreversibilities and the Timing of Environmental Policy

Robert S. Pindyck

Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. 22, pp. 233-59 (2000).

Robert S. Pindyck, Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. 22, pp. 233-59 (2000).

The standard framework in which economists evaluate environmental policies is cost-benefit analysis, so policy debates usually focus on expected flows of costs and benefits, or on the choice of discount rate. But this can be misleading when there is uncertainty over future outcomes, when there are irreversibilities, and when policy adoption can be delayed. This paper shows how two kinds of uncertainty - over the future costs and benefits of reduced environmental degradation, and over the evolution of an ecosystem - interact with two kinds of irreversibilities - sunk costs associated with environmental regulation, and sunk benefits of avoided environmental degradation - to affect optimal policy timing and design.


For Associates Only

As a benefit to our Associates, the latest Working Papers are embargoed for a period of up to six months before becoming accessible to the public. If you are interested in becoming an Associate or learning more about the benefits of sponsorship, please click here, or email us at

If you are a CEEPR Associate or CEEPR staff member, please visit the login page here: